Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Arbitration & Commercial LawDelhi High Court

A Raj Construction Co vs. Bank of Baroda

Original Miscellaneous Petition (Commercial) · 2026:DHC:7885Decided 15 Sept 2026New Delhi Bench
O.M.P. (COMM) 196/2016CNR: DLHC011264592016
Justice Om Prakash Shukla

Background

The petitioner had filed a petition years earlier challenging an arbitral award in its dispute with Bank of Baroda, but when the case was called for hearing, no one appeared on the petitioner's behalf.

Decision Breakdown

After the matter was called twice with no appearance by or on behalf of the petitioner, the Court concluded the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the case and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution, while giving the petitioner liberty to apply for restoration within three months if the case still had merit.

Lesson Learnt

Even a potentially valid legal challenge can be lost simply through inaction, failing to show up in court for a scheduled hearing can result in the case being dismissed, though a limited window to seek restoration is usually available.

A Raj Construction Co vs. Bank of Baroda – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware