Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Uncategorized (needs manual review)Supreme Court of India

Abhinitam Upadhyay vs Hon'ble Allahabad High Court Through Its Registrar General

Review Petition (Civil)Decided 11 Jan 2022
Review Petition (Civil) No.1353 of 2021
Uday Umesh Lalit · Ajay Rastogi

Background

The petitioner, appearing in person, had earlier filed a Special Leave Petition against the Allahabad High Court (through its Registrar General) which was disposed of by an order dated 5 July 2021. Dissatisfied with that outcome, he filed this review petition asking the Supreme Court to reconsider its own earlier order, and also sought an oral hearing on the review.

Decision Breakdown

The Court first dismissed the application for an oral hearing in the review petition. It then examined the grounds raised in the review petition itself and found that none of them disclosed any "error apparent on the face of the record": the narrow standard required to reopen a final order in review (as opposed to a full re-argument of the case on merits). Finding no such error, the Bench declined to entertain the review and dismissed it.

Lesson Learnt

A review petition is not a second appeal. The Supreme Court will only reopen a final order if there is a glaring, self-evident error on the face of the record, not merely because a litigant disagrees with the earlier outcome or wants to re-argue the case.

Abhinitam Upadhyay vs Hon'ble Allahabad High Court Through Its Registrar General – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware