Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Criminal LawSupreme Court of India

Abhishek Kumar vs. State of Delhi

Criminal AppealDecided 7 Mar 2022
Criminal Appeal No. 360 of 2022
Uday Umesh Lalit · S. Ravindra Bhat

Background

An FIR was registered against the appellant at New Ashok Nagar Police Station, East Delhi, in May 2019 for serious offences including rape, causing miscarriage without consent, criminal intimidation and voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous means (Sections 376/328/506/313 IPC). Apprehending arrest, the appellant sought anticipatory bail, which the Delhi High Court refused. He appealed to the Supreme Court, which granted him interim protection from coercive action back in December 2019: protection he had enjoyed for over two years by the time of this hearing.

Decision Breakdown

After hearing counsel for both sides and considering the entirety of the situation, notably that the appellant had already been under interim protection for over two years without any adverse development, the Court held he was entitled to anticipatory bail. It allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and directed that if arrested, he be released on furnishing cash security of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties, subject to fully cooperating with the investigation and presenting himself before the Investigating Officer whenever required.

Lesson Learnt

Prolonged, incident-free interim protection from arrest can itself become a strong factor favouring a grant of anticipatory bail on appeal, even in cases involving serious allegations. Courts weigh the accused's actual conduct during the protected period, not just the gravity of the charges.

Abhishek Kumar vs. State of Delhi – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware