Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Civil Property & InheritanceSupreme Court of India

Agra Development Authority, Agra vs Anek Singh

Civil AppealDecided 20 May 2022
Civil Appeal No. 2914 of 2022
M.R. Shah · B.V. Nagarathna

Background

The Agra Development Authority had acquired certain land, but the original landowners (the respondents) filed a writ petition claiming that the acquisition should be deemed to have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, because compensation had allegedly not been paid to them. The Allahabad High Court's Single Judge, relying on the Supreme Court's earlier decision in Pune Municipal Corporation v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki, allowed the writ petition and declared the acquisition lapsed. The Division Bench upheld this on appeal.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court noted that the High Court's entire reasoning rested on the Pune Municipal Corporation judgment, which had since been expressly overruled by a five-judge Constitution Bench in Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal. Under the Constitution Bench's clarified law, a Section 24(2) lapse occurs only where both possession has not been taken and compensation has not been paid for five years; if either possession is taken or compensation is paid/tendered, there is no lapse, and mere non-deposit of compensation in court does not by itself cause a lapse. Since the High Court's judgment was founded entirely on a legal position that no longer held good, the Supreme Court quashed the High Court's judgment, held that the acquisition had not lapsed, and dismissed the original writ petition, with no order as to costs.

Lesson Learnt

When a Constitution Bench overrules an earlier Supreme Court precedent, any lower court judgment based solely on that overruled precedent becomes unsustainable and liable to be set aside: landowners cannot claim their land acquisition has "lapsed" merely on non-deposit of compensation in court if possession was validly taken or compensation was otherwise paid/tendered.

Agra Development Authority, Agra vs Anek Singh – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware