Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Civil Property & InheritanceSupreme Court of India

Ambalal Babulal Patel Etc. Etc. vs. Group General Manager, ONGC & Anr.

Civil AppealDecided 19 Jan 2022
Civil Appeal Nos. 385-386 of 2022
Ajay Rastogi · Abhay S. Oka

Background

Lands at villages Pansar, Dhamasana and Isand (Taluka Kalol, District Gandhinagar, Gujarat) were acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for a public purpose benefiting ONGC. After the Special Land Acquisition Officer fixed compensation, the landowners sought a reference, and the Reference Court awarded them additional compensation with interest and statutory benefits. ONGC challenged this before the Gujarat High Court, which upheld the statutory benefits but reduced the rate of additional compensation, prompting the landowners to appeal to the Supreme Court in this batch of connected appeals.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court, after hearing both sides, held that the Reference Court's assessment of additional compensation, arrived at after properly appreciating the material on record under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, was neither unsupported by evidence nor legally unsustainable. It found that the High Court's interference in reducing that additional compensation was not justified. The Court therefore restored the additional compensation as originally awarded by the Reference Court, modifying the High Court's judgment only to that limited extent, and disposed of all the connected appeals in the same terms.

Lesson Learnt

Appellate courts should be cautious about overturning a Reference Court's compensation assessment in land acquisition cases when that assessment is properly grounded in the evidence on record; landowners who feel shortchanged by a land acquisition award have a real remedy through reference and further appeal.

Ambalal Babulal Patel Etc. Etc. vs. Group General Manager, ONGC & Anr. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware