Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Company & Insolvency LawSupreme Court of India

Anand Murti vs. Soni Infratech Private Limited & Anr.

Civil AppealDecided 27 Apr 2022
Civil Appeal No. 7534 of 2021
L. Nageswara Rao · B.R. Gavai

Background

The appellant was the suspended director/promoter of a company (the Corporate Debtor) developing a housing project that had stalled due to disputes among its earlier promoters. After one home-buyer sought a refund and it wasn't paid, the company was pushed into insolvency proceedings (CIRP) by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in 2019. The promoter repeatedly sought to instead settle with all home-buyers and complete the project himself, but the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) rejected his latest modification application in November 2021, prompting this appeal to the Supreme Court.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court noted that, following its own earlier order, the promoter had convened a stakeholders' meeting in October 2021 where most home-buyers' objections to his revised settlement/resolution plan were resolved, and the promoter's status report confirming this was apparently overlooked by the NCLAT when it rejected the modification application. The promoter filed a fresh sworn affidavit committing to complete the project in phases within 6-15 months, arrange initial funding of Rs. 10 crore, not increase flat prices, and refund the handful of remaining objecting buyers (7 out of 452) with interest. Finding this a genuinely better outcome for the home-buyers than continuing a full insolvency process (which could involve cost escalation), the Court allowed the appeal, set aside the NCLAT's rejection order, permitted the promoter to complete the project on the terms of his affidavit-undertaking, and directed periodic progress reports to the NCLAT.

Lesson Learnt

In insolvency cases involving unfinished housing projects, courts will favour a workable, home-buyer-backed settlement that gets flats delivered over a prolonged formal insolvency process, provided the promoter puts concrete, enforceable commitments (funding, timelines, no price escalation) on record by way of a sworn undertaking.

Anand Murti vs. Soni Infratech Private Limited & Anr. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware