Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Tax & Customs LawSupreme Court of India

Anil Minda and Others vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Civil Appeal · 2023 INSC 287Decided 24 Mar 2023
Civil Appeal Nos. 345-350 of 2012
M.R. Shah · C.T. Ravikumar

Background

The Income Tax Department carried out a search on the appellants under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, issuing a first search warrant on 13 March 2001 (finally executed via a Panchnama on 11 April 2001) and a second, separate warrant on 26 March 2001 (executed the same day). The tax assessment orders were passed in April 2003. The assessees argued this was time-barred, since the two-year limitation period should be counted from the date of the last authorisation (26 March 2001), which would mean the limitation expired by March 2003. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal agreed with the assessees, but the Delhi High Court reversed this and held the assessments were within time, counting from 11 April 2001 (the date of the last Panchnama, not the last authorisation).

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court examined Section 158BE and its Explanation 2, which says an authorisation "shall be deemed to have been executed" on the date the search concludes, "as recorded in the last panchnama drawn." Relying on its earlier ruling in VLS Finance Ltd. v. CIT, the Court held that the relevant date for starting the limitation clock is the date the last Panchnama (search-conclusion document) was drawn, not the date the authorisation itself was issued, because assessment proceedings are based on all material gathered up to the actual conclusion of the search. Since the last Panchnama relating to the first authorisation was drawn on 11 April 2001, the assessment order passed in April 2003 was within the two-year limit. The appeals were dismissed, upholding the High Court's ruling, with no order as to costs.

Lesson Learnt

When multiple search warrants and raids happen in sequence during a tax investigation, the two-year clock for completing a block assessment starts from when the last search actually concludes and its final Panchnama is signed, not from when the paperwork authorising the search was issued.

Anil Minda and Others vs. Commissioner of Income Tax – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware