Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Service & Administrative LawSupreme Court of India

Anraj Devi v. Deepak Kumar

Contempt Petition · 2025 INSC 64Decided 8 Jan 2025
CONMT.PET.(C) No.-000465 - 2019
Justice J.K. Maheshwari · Justice Rajesh Bindal

Background

The petitioner's late husband had worked as a Store Keeper at a college in Aurangabad and was eventually absorbed into service by Magadh University following an earlier Supreme Court order. After his death, the petitioner's family pension and post-retiral dues were not settled, so she filed a contempt petition alleging non-compliance with the Court's earlier 2017 order confirming his absorption.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court did not find it necessary to punish anyone for contempt, but used the petition as an opportunity to give practical directions. It directed the petitioner to submit a representation with supporting documents to the University's Registrar/Vice Chancellor, directed the University to hold an inquiry and pass a reasoned order on the family pension and retiral benefits within three months, and directed payment within two months thereafter, while leaving the petitioner free to approach the High Court if dissatisfied. The petition was disposed of on these terms.

Lesson Learnt

A contempt petition can sometimes be used pragmatically to obtain concrete enforcement directions even where the Court does not go so far as to record a finding of wilful contempt. Courts will step in to ensure a widow does not remain indefinitely deprived of her deceased spouse's pension dues.

Anraj Devi v. Deepak Kumar – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware