Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
The appellant sued to be declared the exclusive owner of roughly 2 acres 61 cents of land, tracing his title through a 1928 sale deed to one Puliyankaladi and a subsequent 1963 sale deed by which Puliyankaladi sold the same property to the appellant's father. Both the trial court and the first appellate court found in the appellant's favor and decreed the entire property to him, but the Madras High Court (Madurai Bench), in a second appeal filed by the defendants, reversed these concurrent findings and held the appellant entitled to only 96 cents, reasoning that the 1928 sale deed was merely a certified/registration copy (not the original) and so could not be relied upon without independent corroborating proof.
The Supreme Court held that a High Court can interfere with concurrent findings of fact in a second appeal only on limited, well-defined grounds (e.g., findings that are perverse or based on no evidence) after framing a genuine "substantial question of law": mere re-appreciation of evidence is not permitted. On the merits, the Court held the High Court erred in treating the certified copy of the 1928 registered sale deed as inadmissible: since the original was a public document, Sections 65(e), 74, 77 and 79 of the Evidence Act, read with Section 57(5) of the Registration Act, make a certified copy of a registered document admissible secondary evidence of its contents without requiring the original or independent corroborating witnesses. Since the deed's execution was never actually disputed and both the 1928 and 1963 sale deeds covered the same full extent of land (2 acres 61 cents), there was no legal basis to cut down the appellant's title to only 96 cents. The Supreme Court therefore set aside the High Court's judgment and restored the concurrent decrees of the trial court and first appellate court granting the appellant full title and possession.
A certified copy of a registered sale deed is valid secondary evidence of its contents under the Evidence Act and Registration Act: a court cannot reject it merely because the original was not produced or an independent witness did not corroborate it, especially where its execution was never actually disputed.
