Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Uncategorized (needs manual review)Supreme Court of India

Arjun Prakash vs Shyam Sahani & Ors.

Review Petition (Civil)Decided 30 Aug 2022
Review Petition (Civil) No. 1837 of 2020

Background

Having already lost a civil appeal and a subsequent review petition in the Supreme Court, the petitioner Arjun Prakash filed a curative petition, the final and most restricted remedy available in Indian law to challenge a Supreme Court order. As with such petitions, an oral hearing was not held; the Court examined the papers on record.

Decision Breakdown

Applying the well-settled standard from Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra & Another, (2002) 4 SCC 388, under which a curative petition can succeed only where there has been a violation of natural justice or a demonstrable case of bias in the earlier proceedings, the four-judge bench found that no such case was made out. The curative petition was accordingly dismissed.

Lesson Learnt

Curative petitions exist to correct a genuine, narrow category of injustice (bias or a breach of natural justice), not to give a litigant another opportunity to re-argue the merits of a case that has already been decided and reviewed.

Arjun Prakash vs Shyam Sahani & Ors. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware