Real Judgements, Distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering — with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Show

Criminal Law

Sanofi India Ltd. v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 957

A company can be criminally prosecuted for offences requiring criminal intent even if no specific director or employee is separately named as an accused — Indian law does not require identifying the corporation's "directing mind" as a precondition, except where a specific statute (like cheque-bounce cases under the NI Act) explicitly makes individual liability dependent on the company itself being an accused; for other offences, it is enough that the chargesheet shows some person acted on the company's behalf in circumstances suggesting wrongful intent, leaving the merits to be decided at trial.

Decided 7 Sept 2026View details

Environmental Law

M/S Punahchakran Private Limited v. Indotech Waste Solution

Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 956

Technical regulatory guidelines can be legally binding even without formal Gazette publication if they are made reasonably accessible (e.g., published on the regulator's website), and businesses seeking environmental approvals can validly rely on land-requirement relaxations and earlier-obtained technical studies rather than being forced to restart the entire approval process from scratch, so long as the substantive safeguards are actually met.

Decided 7 Sept 2026View details

Tax & Customs Law

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited v. The District Revenue Officer (Stamps) & Anr.

Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 963

A property buyer/purchaser who has honestly paid stamp duty on the actual, justifiable market value of a property should generally raise defences to a stamp-duty short-levy notice before the statutory authority (and appellate machinery) rather than rushing to a writ court, since courts will interfere with a show-cause notice only for want of jurisdiction or bad faith — not simply because the recipient disagrees with the valuation. The case also flags an unsettled but important legal question — whether stamp authorities need to prove fraudulent intent before demanding extra duty for undervaluation — that is now pending before a larger Supreme Court bench.

Decided 7 Sept 2026View details

Criminal Law

Dhanraj v. State of Rajasthan

Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 958

A conviction cannot rest merely on an out-of-court identification parade when the prosecution had every opportunity, and a corresponding duty, to have the witness identify the accused directly in the courtroom during trial — and judges are expected to actively ensure such crucial evidentiary gaps are filled rather than remaining passive umpires.

Decided 7 Sept 2026View details

Service & Administrative Law

Shirish Pandharinath Patil v. The State of Maharashtra

Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 949

Even when a Scheduled Caste/Tribe certificate obtained decades ago is ultimately found invalid, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to protect a long-serving, retired employee's pension and retiral dues on equitable grounds — but such relief is strictly limited and does not revive or legitimize the underlying invalid certificate for any other purpose.