Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1094
An older qualification must still satisfy the eligibility rules governing the appointment sought. Here, the certificate's early date did not secure reinstatement, and rejection of eligibility should not be confused with a conclusive finding that the certificate was forged.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1095
A party benefiting from a conditional stay must meet its deposit requirement or face enforcement. The additional ₹15 crore deposit secures the pending dispute; it does not settle the land's final compensation or amount to an immediate payment to the landowners.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1093
An alleged attempt to kill does not become a lesser offence simply because the victim avoided a fatal injury. Restoring this charge means the accusation must be tried; it does not establish that the accused is guilty.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1090
For the assessment in this case, assistance reducing ordinary manufacturing costs was taxable even though the government wanted to encourage industry. The purpose and actual operation of the particular subsidy mattered more than its general development label.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1091
Proof that someone caused a serious injury does not by itself prove the additional ingredients of robbery. A court can substitute a lesser offence supported by the evidence; the sentencing reduction here depended on Appa's particular circumstances.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1092
Someone challenging an election must ensure that the personal-presentation requirement is met and can be proved. Merely entering the court building does not establish compliance, and a filing defect can end the challenge before the election allegations are examined.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1088
An employee who retires on 30 June may be entitled to the increment that falls due on 1 July after completing a year of service. Authorities that delay paying the amounts due must pay interest after the deadline set by the court.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1089
Recruitment must follow the qualifications stated in the advertisement and the governing Recruitment Rules. A court will not override a merit-based eligibility decision made under those rules merely because the candidate concerned was higher in the written test.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8797
A person who occupied property only because of employment has no independent right to remain once the employment and decree end. Even when a petition fails, courts can make practical arrangements to let a person recover personal belongings.
14543 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreThree appellants, a father and his two sons from an earlier marriage, were convicted of murdering the father's second wife, Zahida Begum, and her young son, whose decomposed bodies were found in a septic tank behind the family's house about two months after they went missing. One of the sons had confessed to the police and led them to the bodies; the family had never reported the two as missing. The trial court sentenced all three to death, which the High Court commuted to life imprisonment while upholding the convictions.
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the son who confessed and led police to the bodies, since his own conduct (showing the police where the bodies were hidden) was independently admissible evidence of guilt, not merely his confession. However, for the father and the other son, the Court held that a co-accused's confession alone cannot be used as evidence against them without independent proof of their own involvement, and so it acquitted them of murder (Section 302 IPC). It nonetheless convicted both of them under Section 201 IPC (destroying evidence/screening an offender from punishment) because they lived in the same house, never reported the disappearances, and offered no explanation for the bodies found on their property.
A confession made by one accused person to the police can be used as evidence of that person's own conduct (such as leading police to hidden evidence), but it cannot by itself be used to convict a co-accused of the main offence unless there is separate, independent evidence connecting the co-accused to the crime.
