Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1073
In circumstantial-evidence cases, forensic and DNA evidence must actually corroborate the alleged crime: a conviction cannot survive where the most crucial scientific evidence, on its own terms, points away from rather than toward the prosecution's theory.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1074
A conviction based purely on circumstantial evidence requires every link in the chain, timeline, witness credibility, forensic matches, and motive, to be proven beyond reasonable doubt; gaps or suppressed evidence at any link entitle the accused to the benefit of the doubt, even in a serious case like a double murder.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8505
Courts will not quash a criminal case merely because the accused has a plausible alibi-type defence; unless that defence is conclusive and undisputed, the matter must be tested through the ordinary trial process.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8547
A private compromise between victim and accused cannot by itself secure quashing of a case involving serious, heinous allegations like attempted murder with a weapon: such matters must proceed to trial regardless of settlement.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8563
Railway Claims Tribunals cannot reject a bona fide passenger's death claim based on speculative inferences when there is no direct evidence of an alternative cause of death; the compensation scheme under the Railways Act is to be interpreted generously in favour of victims' families.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8559
In matrimonial offences, courts can and do quash criminal proceedings once a genuine compromise is verified directly with the complainant, sparing both parties a prolonged and pointless trial.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8541
A co-accused's bail does not automatically extend to another accused where their actual roles in the offence differ materially; delay caused by one's own defence counsel cannot later be used as a ground for bail.
Execution Petition · 2026:DHC:8567
An arbitral award must be adequately stamped before a court can enforce it; courts give only a limited window to cure such defects, after which the award becomes legally unusable until the deficiency is fixed.
Arbitration Petition · 2026:DHC:8555
A genuine settlement reached through mediation renders a pending arbitration-related court petition moot, allowing parties to close out litigation quickly once they resolve their dispute privately.
7878 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
A man named Gosaidas Samanta died in 1929 leaving a will that divided his property among two of his sons and a grandson, leaving out his third son, Upendra. Decades later, the appellant, who had bought part of the property from Upendra, disputed the will when the respondent (grandson of one of the named heirs) applied for "letters of administration" (court permission to administer the deceased's estate under the will) since the will itself had never been formally proved in court. Both attesting witnesses to the 1929 will had died by the time of the case, so the courts had to rely on other evidence, including the testator's sons' testimony, a related 1945 partition deed, and Upendra's own signed acknowledgment of the will.
The trial court and the Calcutta High Court both found the will genuine and granted letters of administration, and the appellant challenged this before the Supreme Court, arguing among other things that the courts wrongly relied on the "30-years-old document" presumption under Section 90 of the Evidence Act. The Supreme Court agreed that Section 90's presumption of genuineness for old documents does not, by itself, prove a will: a will must specifically be proved under Section 63 of the Succession Act and Section 68 of the Evidence Act (which normally requires examining an attesting witness). However, since both attesting witnesses were dead, Section 69 of the Evidence Act allowed proof by other means, such as identifying the handwriting/signatures through other credible witnesses. The Court found that the testimony of the testator's sons and another witness who had actually seen the will being signed, combined with the corroborating 1945 partition deed and Upendra's own signed document referencing the will, was sufficient proof. The appeal was dismissed and the will upheld.
A very old document is not automatically treated as a validly executed will just because of its age: a will must still be proved through witnesses or, if the original attesting witnesses have died, through other credible evidence establishing the signatures and circumstances of its execution.
