Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1094
An older qualification must still satisfy the eligibility rules governing the appointment sought. Here, the certificate's early date did not secure reinstatement, and rejection of eligibility should not be confused with a conclusive finding that the certificate was forged.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1095
A party benefiting from a conditional stay must meet its deposit requirement or face enforcement. The additional ₹15 crore deposit secures the pending dispute; it does not settle the land's final compensation or amount to an immediate payment to the landowners.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1093
An alleged attempt to kill does not become a lesser offence simply because the victim avoided a fatal injury. Restoring this charge means the accusation must be tried; it does not establish that the accused is guilty.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1090
For the assessment in this case, assistance reducing ordinary manufacturing costs was taxable even though the government wanted to encourage industry. The purpose and actual operation of the particular subsidy mattered more than its general development label.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1091
Proof that someone caused a serious injury does not by itself prove the additional ingredients of robbery. A court can substitute a lesser offence supported by the evidence; the sentencing reduction here depended on Appa's particular circumstances.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1092
Someone challenging an election must ensure that the personal-presentation requirement is met and can be proved. Merely entering the court building does not establish compliance, and a filing defect can end the challenge before the election allegations are examined.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1088
An employee who retires on 30 June may be entitled to the increment that falls due on 1 July after completing a year of service. Authorities that delay paying the amounts due must pay interest after the deadline set by the court.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1089
Recruitment must follow the qualifications stated in the advertisement and the governing Recruitment Rules. A court will not override a merit-based eligibility decision made under those rules merely because the candidate concerned was higher in the written test.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8797
A person who occupied property only because of employment has no independent right to remain once the employment and decree end. Even when a petition fails, courts can make practical arrangements to let a person recover personal belongings.
14543 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreThe appellants (plaintiffs who had succeeded in a trial-court suit, O.S. No.1 of 2003, directing the framing of a scheme for trust properties including a temple) challenged an interim order of the Kerala High Court, passed in a pending Regular First Appeal filed by the defendants, which modified an earlier stay by vacating it specifically to allow interim arrangements for reviving temple poojas/rituals that had stopped, while keeping the stay on other properties. The appellants sought reconsideration of that interim order before the High Court, which was dismissed, leading to this appeal to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court held that the orders under challenge were purely interim in nature, passed in a first appeal that was itself still pending final disposal before the High Court, and declined to interfere with their legality. The Court observed it would serve everyone's interest for the first appeal itself to be finally disposed of on merits, and accordingly requested the High Court to expeditiously decide the appeal, preferably within six months. It left it open to the parties to approach the High Court for any further modification of the interim arrangements. With these observations, the appeals challenging the interim order were dismissed.
The Supreme Court will ordinarily not interfere with a High Court's interim/stay arrangements in a pending appeal, and will instead direct the High Court to expedite final disposal of the underlying appeal on merits.
