Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Criminal LawSupreme Court of India

Baba Natarajan Prasad vs M. Revathi

Not available · 2024 INSC 523Decided 15 Jul 2024
Not available
Justice C.T. Ravikumar · Justice Sanjay Kumar

Background

The appellant-husband complained that his wife married another man while divorce proceedings between them were still pending, and a child was born from that second marriage: an offence of bigamy under Section 494 IPC. The trial court convicted the wife and the second husband, sentencing each to one year's rigorous imprisonment and a fine, but on appeal the first appellate court had acquitted them; the Madras High Court then restored the conviction but the accused did not challenge that restoration, leaving only the husband's separate appeal on the ground that the sentence was still too lenient.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court reiterated that sentencing must be proportionate to the gravity of the offence and cannot be reduced merely because time has passed since the crime. However, weighing the fact that a child born of the second marriage was now about six years old and that the maximum sentence under Section 494 IPC is seven years with no prescribed minimum, the Court exercised judicial discretion to actually reduce the sentence to six months' simple imprisonment each (and reduced the fine back to Rs. 2,000 each), while directing that the two accused surrender one after the other, never simultaneously, so the child would not be left without a parent at any point. The Court expressly clarified this staggered-surrender arrangement was not to be treated as a precedent.

Lesson Learnt

Even in cases where a complainant seeks enhancement of an "inadequate" sentence, courts weigh present-day humane circumstances, such as the welfare of a young child, alongside the general principle that punishment should be proportionate to the crime.

Baba Natarajan Prasad vs M. Revathi – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware