Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Motor Accident Compensation LawSupreme Court of India

Baby Sakshi Greola vs. Manzoor Ahmad Simon & Anr.

Not available · 2024 INSC 963Decided 11 Dec 2024
Not available
Justice B.R. Gavai · Justice K.V. Viswanathan

Background

In 2009, the appellant, then a seven-year-old child, was crossing a Delhi road on a zebra crossing with her mother and brother when a speeding car struck her, leaving her with grievous, disabling injuries. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal initially awarded her about Rs. 5.9 lakh in compensation, and the Delhi High Court later enhanced this by a further Rs. 5.6 lakh. Still dissatisfied that the award did not reflect the true extent of her lifelong injuries and needs, she appealed to the Supreme Court for further enhancement.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court substantially raised the compensation across several heads, including attendant charges (calculated using an 18-year multiplier based on her age), pain and suffering, future medical treatment, and loss of marriage prospects, bringing the total award to roughly Rs. 50.87 lakh. It directed the insurance company to pay this amount, ordered an initial Rs. 10 lakh to be released to her guardian for immediate needs, and directed the remainder be kept in fixed deposits to secure her long-term financial welfare, with interest payable monthly to her guardian.

Lesson Learnt

Courts will look closely and generously at the real, lifelong medical and financial needs of a child injured in an accident rather than mechanically applying a low, one-time compensation figure, and will build in safeguards like fixed deposits to protect a minor victim's award from misuse.

Baby Sakshi Greola vs. Manzoor Ahmad Simon & Anr. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware