LegalAware
LegalAware.ai
EMPOWERING LEGAL AWARENESS

Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Criminal LawSupreme Court of India

Balu Sudam Khalde and Another vs The State of Maharashtra

Criminal Appeal · 2023 INSC 314Decided 29 Mar 2023
Criminal Appeal No. 1910 of 2010
Sudhanshu Dhulia · J.B. Pardiwala

Background

On the night of 1 April 2001, a verbal altercation broke out between the first informant's friend, the deceased Abbas Baig, and one of the accused. The dispute escalated when the two appellants and two other co-accused arrived at the scene armed with a sickle and a sword; the first informant was injured on the head, and the deceased suffered multiple serious wounds from which he died. The trial court convicted all four accused, but acquitted two of them, convicting the two appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and sentencing them to life imprisonment; the Bombay High Court upheld this conviction, leading to the present appeal before the Supreme Court, where the appellants argued that the incident was a sudden, unpremeditated fight that should be treated as culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.

Decision Breakdown

The Court undertook a detailed doctrinal analysis of the distinction between "murder" and "culpable homicide not amounting to murder" under Sections 299 and 300 IPC, and explained the four conditions necessary to invoke Exception 4 to Section 300 (a sudden fight, no premeditation, action in the heat of passion, and no undue advantage taken or cruelty shown by the offender). Applying these principles, the Court held that even assuming the fight arose suddenly and without premeditation, the appellants had inflicted as many as nine blows with dangerous weapons (a sickle and sword) on an unarmed and helpless victim, which amounted to taking undue advantage and acting in a cruel and unusual manner, disqualifying them from the benefit of Exception 4. Since the injuries were sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, the case squarely fell within the definition of murder under Section 300 IPC. The Court accordingly dismissed the appeal, upheld the conviction and sentence, cancelled the appellants' bail bonds, and directed them to surrender before the trial court within two weeks to serve out their sentence.

Lesson Learnt

A fight being "sudden" and unplanned is not, by itself, enough to reduce a killing from murder to culpable homicide. If the attacker inflicts repeated, excessive violence with a deadly weapon on an unarmed and defenceless victim, the law treats that as taking undue advantage and acting with cruelty, which forfeits the lesser-offence exception even in a heat-of-the-moment confrontation.

Official source (sci.gov.in)View Judgment (PDF)
Balu Sudam Khalde and Another vs The State of Maharashtra – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware