Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
The Haryana government acquired large tracts of land at villages Kheri Sadh and Baliyana, District Rohtak, in two phases (2006 and 2008 notifications) to set up an Industrial Model Township. The Land Acquisition Officer initially fixed compensation at Rs. 16,00,000 per acre; landowners sought enhancement through Reference Courts and the Punjab & Haryana High Court, which granted different, inconsistent enhancements for the two villages and the two acquisition phases based on differing sale-exemplar evidence and "cuts" applied for undeveloped land. Both landowners and the State cross-appealed to the Supreme Court, with landowners arguing the compensation was still too low (citing a high-value sale exemplar and a later, much higher land allotment to Maruti Suzuki) and the State arguing the High Court had over-enhanced it.
For Kheri Sadh's first-phase acquisition, the Court held the High Court erred in reducing the "cut" applied to certain sale exemplars from 20% to 10%, and restored the Reference Court's rates (Rs. 24,00,000/acre near the highway, Rs. 19,77,000/acre beyond it), partly allowing the State's appeal and dismissing the landowners'. It then applied the same first-phase logic with a 12% annual escalation to the second-phase acquisition (20 months later), fixing rates of Rs. 28,80,000 and Rs. 23,72,400 per acre, but left the High Court's order otherwise undisturbed since the State had not itself appealed that phase. For village Baliyana, the Court rejected the landowners' claim to parity with Kheri Sadh, holding that despite adjoining boundaries, the Reference Court had correctly found the two villages were not comparable in market potential given their different road frontages, and separately rejected reliance on the much later, much higher Maruti Suzuki land-allotment rate since it postdated the acquisition by three years and included development costs. The Baliyana compensation of Rs. 17,00,000 per acre was therefore confirmed and those appeals dismissed.
In land acquisition compensation disputes, courts will not automatically equalise compensation for adjoining villages or plots merely because they share a boundary: actual market comparability (road access, location, and timing of sale exemplars relative to the acquisition notification) governs, and evidence of land value from years after the acquisition, especially involving added development costs, is not a reliable yardstick for valuing the land as it stood on the acquisition date.
