Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Land in Rajasthan had been allotted to one Chunilal, a Scheduled Caste landless person. In 1972, Chunilal was allegedly induced by a high-caste moneylender, Puran Singh, to sign a sale deed transferring the land to Bhadar Ram, a Scheduled Caste resident of Punjab. Chunilal sued for ejectment, arguing the sale violated statutory restrictions on transferring such allotted land, and the trial court decreed in his favour; the matter then wound through the Revenue Appellate Tribunal, the Board of Revenue (which allowed compounding of the violation), a Single Judge of the Rajasthan High Court, and finally a Division Bench, which held the sale void because Bhadar Ram, though Scheduled Caste, belonged to Punjab and could not claim Scheduled Caste land-purchase benefits reserved for Rajasthan's own Scheduled Caste allottees.
The Supreme Court affirmed the Division Bench, relying on its own earlier Constitution Bench rulings (including Action Committee on Issue of Caste Certificate v. Union of India) that Scheduled Caste status is territory-specific: a person recognised as Scheduled Caste in one state cannot invoke that status to claim benefits meant for Scheduled Castes of a different state. Since Bhadar Ram was a permanent resident of Punjab, he could not use his Scheduled Caste status to lawfully purchase land reserved for Rajasthan's Scheduled Caste allottees, making the sale void under Section 42 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955. The Court also held that the Board of Revenue's compounding of the violation under Section 13A(2) of the Rajasthan Colonization Act, 1954 was itself invalid, because that provision only applies when an ejectment order has been passed but not executed: here, possession had already been handed back to the original allottee's heir before compounding was granted. The appeal was accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Scheduled Caste status and its associated land-purchase protections are recognised only within the state where the certificate/allotment scheme operates; a Scheduled Caste person from one state cannot use that status to acquire land reserved for a different state's Scheduled Caste beneficiaries, and procedural relief like "compounding" a land-law violation cannot be granted once the property has already been physically repossessed under a valid ejectment order.
