Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Thousands of employees of five erstwhile Bihar State Corporations (Construction, Industrial Development, Electronic Development, Forest Development, and Panchayati Raj Financial) had gone unpaid for salaries and retiral dues for nearly 25 years, following the 2000 bifurcation of Bihar into Bihar and Jharkhand, because the two states never finished apportioning the corporations' assets and liabilities. The crisis caused severe hardship, including reported instances of destitution, starvation, and suicides among affected employees and their families. An earlier Supreme Court intervention in Kapila Hingorani v. State of Bihar (2003) had provided only partial interim relief. A writ petition was filed in 2022 seeking directions to both states and the Union to complete the bifurcation process and release the outstanding dues.
The Supreme Court had earlier constituted a Committee headed by Justice Dinesh Maheshwari (Retd.) to examine and recommend a resolution. In this order, the Court largely accepted the Committee's Final Report, directing that inter-state liability for salaries and retiral dues be settled per the Committee's computation (based on the Union of India's affidavit), that pay revision benefits be confined to Pay Commissions actually adopted by the corporations before they became defunct, and that Provident Fund dues be disbursed per the Committee's recommended mechanism. The Court also directed a Rs. 35 lakh honorarium be paid to Justice Maheshwari for chairing the Committee, split equally between Bihar and Jharkhand. However, several issues remained unresolved (verification of remaining claimants/legal heirs, compensation for daily-wage workers, and interest on delayed payments) so the matter was kept part-heard and listed for further hearing on 1 September 2026, with both states directed to file compliance affidavits in the meantime.
Even decades-old, seemingly intractable inter-state administrative disputes affecting citizens' basic livelihood can be judicially managed through expert committees, and courts can issue binding interim directions on parts of a dispute while keeping the matter open for the remaining unresolved issues.
