Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Civil Property & InheritanceSupreme Court of India

Bijay Kumar Manish Kumar HUF vs. Ashwin Bhanulal Desai

Not available · 2024 INSC 445Decided 17 May 2024
Not available
Justice J.K. Maheshwari · Justice Sanjay Karol

Background

The landlord (petitioner) had moved the Calcutta High Court and then the Supreme Court by way of Special Leave Petitions over a dispute on whether the West Bengal Tenancy Act or the Transfer of Property Act governed a landlord-tenant relationship involving four tenancies, after the tenant allegedly stopped paying rent and the landlord sought eviction. While the main SLPs remained pending, the landlord filed interlocutory applications (IAs) asking the Court to direct the tenant to pay rent and other dues accruing during the litigation.

Decision Breakdown

The Court did not decide the main tenancy-law question, which remains pending. Instead, ruling only on the interlocutory applications, it accepted the landlord's calculation of dues (rent, interest and related amounts) and directed the tenant-respondent to deposit Rs. 5,15,05,512 with the Supreme Court Registry within four weeks, to be kept in an interest-bearing fixed deposit, with an affidavit of compliance to follow. The Court clarified this interim payment direction is without prejudice to, and subject to, the final outcome of the pending Special Leave Petitions, which were listed to be taken up again in July 2024.

Lesson Learnt

Even while a larger legal dispute (such as which tenancy law applies) remains unresolved, courts can order a tenant in continued occupation to deposit accruing rent/mesne profits during the pendency of litigation, so that the landlord is not left without recourse merely because the final decision is delayed.

Bijay Kumar Manish Kumar HUF vs. Ashwin Bhanulal Desai – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware