Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Criminal LawSupreme Court of India

Biltu Bhattacharya vs. State of West Bengal

Diary No.Decided 10 May 2022
Diary No. 29606 of 2021
Uday Umesh Lalit · S. Ravindra Bhat · Bela M. Trivedi · U.U. Lalit together with Justices S. Ravindra Bhat

Background

Biltu Bhattacharya had earlier been convicted by the trial court and the High Court for murder (Section 302 read with 120-B IPC) and an offence under the Arms Act, 1959, and the Supreme Court had affirmed that conviction and sentence in Criminal Appeal No. 1182 of 2019. He then filed a review petition asking the Supreme Court to reconsider its own earlier decision affirming his conviction.

Decision Breakdown

The Court first condoned the delay in filing the review petition. On the merits, it noted that the conviction and sentence had already been affirmed after considering the entire material on record. Having gone through the grounds raised in the review petition, the Bench found no "error apparent on the face of the record", the narrow standard required to succeed in a review, and accordingly dismissed the review petition.

Lesson Learnt

A review petition is not a second appeal or an opportunity to re-argue a case on its merits; the Supreme Court will reopen its own final decision only if there is an obvious, glaring error on the record, and reviews are dismissed where the original decision already properly considered all the material.

Biltu Bhattacharya vs. State of West Bengal – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware