Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Contempt of CourtDelhi High Court

Captain Mohit vs. Vikram Dev Dutt & Anr. and connected matters

Contempt Case (Civil) · 2026:DHC:7574Decided 2 Sept 2026New Delhi Bench
CONT.CAS(C) 113/2022, CONT.CAS(C) 142/2022CNR: DLHC010050992022
Justice Mini Pushkarna

Background

Captain Mohit, a pilot, had earlier withdrawn a writ petition against his former employer after the Court directed that his statutory dues and any arrears of salary be released "in accordance with law," without fixing a specific amount. When he felt the dues were still not fully paid, he filed a contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of that earlier order.

Decision Breakdown

The Court noted that its earlier order left it to the employer's discretion to calculate the exact dues payable, rather than specifying a fixed sum, and that the statutory dues (Provident Fund) had in fact already been paid, as confirmed in a Compliance Affidavit. Since there was no specific, quantified direction that had been disobeyed, the Court held that contempt proceedings could not continue, while leaving Captain Mohit free to pursue any remaining claim for arrears of salary through ordinary legal remedies.

Lesson Learnt

Contempt of court requires disobedience of a clear, specific direction: a general order to "pay dues in accordance with law," without a fixed amount, does not by itself support a contempt case if some payment has already been made.

Captain Mohit vs. Vikram Dev Dutt & Anr. and connected matters – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware