Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Banking & Debt Recovery LawSupreme Court of India

Celir LLP vs. Mr. Sumati Prasad Bafna & Ors.

Not available · 2024 INSC 978Decided 13 Dec 2024
Not available
Justice J.B. Pardiwala · Justice Manoj Misra

Background

Celir LLP had successfully purchased a mortgaged industrial property at a bank e-auction, and the Supreme Court had already confirmed its title to that property in an earlier 2023 judgment. After that ruling, the original borrower and a third party (a "Subsequent Transferee" to whom the borrower had purportedly "redeemed" and re-transferred the very same property) took a series of steps to stop Celir LLP from getting physical possession, writing to government land and registry authorities asking them to freeze any transfer, lodging a police complaint against the bank, and filing a fresh civil suit seeking to invalidate the sale certificate the Supreme Court had already upheld.

Decision Breakdown

The Court held that the release deed and assignment agreement executed by the borrower and the transferee, being made while the matter was already pending before it, were void under the doctrine of "lis pendens," and reaffirmed Celir LLP's absolute title. It directed the transferee to hand over peaceful possession and the original title deeds within a week, with police assistance if needed, and ordered the bank to refund the transferee's mortgage-redemption money. The Court found that both the borrower and the transferee had indeed committed contempt of its earlier 2023 order through these evasive acts, but since they subsequently withdrew their suit and gave an unconditional undertaking to comply, it declined to formally punish them for contempt at this stage.

Lesson Learnt

Once the Supreme Court finally decides a dispute, parties cannot use side-deals, fresh lawsuits, or complaints to government authorities to quietly undo that decision, doing so is itself contempt of court, even if the Court ultimately chooses leniency in punishing it.

Celir LLP vs. Mr. Sumati Prasad Bafna & Ors. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware