Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Banking & Debt Recovery LawSupreme Court of India

Central Bureau of Investigation vs. Kapil Wadhawan & Anr.

Not available · 2024 INSC 58Decided 24 Jan 2024
Not available
Justice Bela M. Trivedi · Justice Pankaj Mithal

Background

Kapil Wadhawan and Dheeraj Wadhawan, promoters of DHFL, were arrested by the CBI over an alleged Rs. 34,000-crore bank fraud involving a consortium of 17 banks. The CBI filed a chargesheet against 75 accused (including the respondents) within the statutory time limit, but stated that investigation was continuing against some other named accused. The Special Court and the Delhi High Court held that this made the chargesheet "incomplete" and granted the respondents default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held that once a chargesheet is filed within the prescribed time and the court takes cognizance on it, the accused's indefeasible right to default bail is extinguished. It is immaterial that further investigation continues against other named accused under Section 173(8) CrPC. Relying on precedents including Dinesh Dalmia and Suresh Kumar Bhikamchand Jain, the Court held a chargesheet is "complete" if it contains the details required by Section 173(2), regardless of pending investigation into other accused or documents. It set aside the bail orders of both lower courts and directed the respondents be taken back into custody.

Lesson Learnt

The right to default/statutory bail under Section 167(2) CrPC exists only until a chargesheet is filed within the statutory period; once filed and cognizance taken, that right ends even if the investigation continues against co-accused. The accused must then seek bail on ordinary merits.

Central Bureau of Investigation vs. Kapil Wadhawan & Anr. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware