LegalAware
LegalAware.ai
EMPOWERING LEGAL AWARENESS

Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Criminal LawSupreme Court of India

Central Bureau of Investigation vs. Vikas Mishra @ Vikash Mishra

Criminal Appeal · 2023 INSC 345Decided 10 Apr 2023
Criminal Appeal No. 957 of 2023
M.R. Shah · C.T. Ravikumar

Background

The CBI had registered a case against officials of Eastern Coalfield Limited, CISF, Railways and others for corruption-related offences. The respondent, Vikas Mishra, was arrested and granted seven days' police custody, but got himself hospitalised during that period and then secured interim bail before the CBI could fully interrogate him in custody. When his interim bail was later cancelled by the Special Court for non-cooperation with the investigation, he was re-arrested and sent to judicial custody. The Calcutta High Court subsequently ordered his release on statutory/default bail because the chargesheet was not filed within 90 days of his re-arrest, and the CBI appealed to the Supreme Court, also seeking to complete the unused portion of his police custody interrogation.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court focused on the CBI's request to exercise the remaining police custody interrogation that it had been unable to use because the accused got hospitalised and then obtained interim bail before the original seven-day custody period ended. The Court held that an accused cannot be permitted to frustrate the investigative process or the court's own orders through such conduct, and that the right to custodial interrogation is an important right of the investigating agency. It questioned whether the rule in CBI v. Anupam J. Kulkarni (barring police custody beyond the first 15 days from arrest) needed reconsideration in situations like this, though it did not formally overrule it. On the facts, since the CBI had only managed about two and a half days of the seven days of sanctioned custody, the Court allowed the CBI's appeal to the extent of granting four additional days of police custody remand of the accused.

Lesson Learnt

An accused cannot use hospitalisation or interim bail to run out the clock on a validly granted police custody order. Courts will look at whether custody time was genuinely exercised, and may permit an investigating agency to recover an unused portion of custodial interrogation where the process was frustrated by the accused's own conduct.

Official source (sci.gov.in)View Judgment (PDF)
Central Bureau of Investigation vs. Vikas Mishra @ Vikash Mishra – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware