Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Arbitration & Commercial LawDelhi High Court

Chandrasen Singh Proprietor Sunshine Finishes vs. M/S BPTP Ltd

Arbitration Petition · 2026:DHC:7482Decided 1 Sept 2026New Delhi Bench
ARB.P. 988/2026CNR: DLHC010250692026
Justice Om Prakash Shukla

Background

The petitioner, a sole-proprietorship contractor, sought appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act to resolve a dispute with real-estate developer BPTP Ltd, relying on the arbitration clause in their agreement.

Decision Breakdown

Both parties agreed on the existence of a valid arbitration clause and were willing to proceed to arbitration. The Court appointed a sole arbitrator under the Delhi International Arbitration Centre rules, leaving all substantive and jurisdictional objections to be decided by the arbitrator.

Lesson Learnt

At the Section 11(6) stage, courts confine themselves strictly to confirming a valid arbitration agreement exists; all merits and objections are left for the arbitrator to decide.

Chandrasen Singh Proprietor Sunshine Finishes vs. M/S BPTP Ltd – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware