Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Arbitration & Commercial LawDelhi High Court

Chauhan Tourist Transport Services vs. K.T.C. India Pvt. Ltd.

Arbitration Petition · 2026:DHC:7943Decided 15 Sept 2026New Delhi Bench
ARB.P. 1264/2026CNR: DLHC010338312026
Justice Om Prakash Shukla

Background

The petitioner sought appointment of an arbitrator to resolve a commercial dispute with the respondent under a contract that contained a valid arbitration clause. Both parties agreed there was a genuine arbitration agreement between them, and the respondent had no objection to a sole arbitrator being appointed.

Decision Breakdown

Since the court's role at this stage is limited to checking whether an arbitration agreement exists on its face, and both parties agreed it did, the Court appointed a named advocate as sole arbitrator to hear the dispute under the rules of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, leaving all substantive objections (including on arbitrability and jurisdiction) to be argued before the arbitrator.

Lesson Learnt

When a contract has a valid arbitration clause and both sides don't dispute its existence, courts will typically appoint an arbitrator quickly rather than delve into the merits, all other arguments are left for the arbitrator to decide.

Chauhan Tourist Transport Services vs. K.T.C. India Pvt. Ltd. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware