Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
A company manufactured cocoa butter and cocoa powder at its Jammu factory and also imported the same products from abroad; both were sent to its Taloja (Maharashtra) unit, where additional labels were affixed on the packaging before the goods were exported. The company claimed cenvat credit for excise duty already paid on the Jammu-made and imported goods, and claimed rebates on duty paid at the time of export. The excise department argued that simply affixing extra labels, on goods that were already labelled and marketable, did not amount to "manufacture," so the company was not entitled to the credit or rebate, and demanded recovery of over Rs. 23 crore in credit plus penalty, alleging the company had suppressed facts. The CESTAT (tax tribunal) was internally divided, but its majority (via a third member) ruled in the company's favour, and the excise department appealed to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court examined Note 3 to Chapter 18 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, which deems certain processes, including "labelling or re-labelling of containers", to amount to "manufacture" for products like cocoa preparations, regardless of whether an actual physical transformation occurs. The Court noted that a 2008 amendment had changed the word "and" to "or" between the listed processes, splitting what was once one combined activity (labelling plus repacking) into three independent activities, any one of which alone now suffices to count as manufacture. Since the company had undisputedly relabelled the goods at its Taloja unit before sending them out, this satisfied the deeming provision on its own, regardless of whether it added any real value or marketability. The Court also agreed there was no suppression of facts by the company, since the dispute was a genuine question of statutory interpretation, not concealment. The CESTAT's decision in the company's favour was upheld and the revenue's appeal dismissed.
Tax and excise statutes sometimes define an activity, like simply relabelling a package, as "manufacture" by legal fiction, even where no physical transformation of the product occurs; a small change in statutory wording (here, "and" to "or") can significantly expand which businesses qualify for tax credits and rebates.
