Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
In 2018, a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court recognised the right of a terminally ill person to refuse life-prolonging treatment and laid down detailed safeguards for making and acting on an "Advance Directive" (a living will). Those safeguards required, among other things, that the document be countersigned by a Judicial Magistrate, that the Magistrate keep copies and inform the family, that a hospital Medical Board of senior specialists with 20 years' standing certify the withdrawal of treatment, and that the District Collector then form a second board to confirm it. The Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine applied to the Court saying that, in practice, these steps had proved so cumbersome that almost no one had been able to use the procedure, and that the very object of the 2018 judgment was being defeated.
The Court noted that ordinarily it would not entertain an application to "clarify" a final judgment, but the Union of India had itself held discussions with medical experts on possible changes, and the practical obstacles reported by doctors made a revisit necessary. It therefore modified the 2018 guidelines to make them workable: the living will now needs attestation before a notary or Gazetted Officer instead of a Judicial Magistrate; the Magistrate's role in preserving copies and informing the family is deleted, and the person may instead give copies to their named nominees, family doctor and local-body custodian, or attach it to their digital health records. The hospital's Primary Medical Board is now the treating physician plus at least two specialists with five years' experience (not 20), which should decide preferably within 48 hours; the Secondary Medical Board is formed by the hospital itself with one doctor nominated by the District Chief Medical Officer and two further specialists, again within 48 hours, replacing the earlier Collector-constituted board. A person may name more than one guardian or relative to give consent on their behalf. The application was disposed of with these modifications and the order was circulated to all High Courts and State health secretaries.
Any adult of sound mind can now make a living will stating when life support should be withdrawn, by signing it before two witnesses and a notary or Gazetted Officer: no court visit is needed. When a right exists on paper but the procedure makes it unusable, the Court can revise its own safeguards so the right becomes real.
