Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
The State of Mizoram invited bids for appointment of distributors/selling agents to run its state lottery. A complaint was filed with the CCI alleging that the four selected bidders had quoted identical rates, amounting to bid-rigging and cartelisation in violation of the Competition Act, 2002, and separately that the State had abused its dominant position by demanding excessive security deposits from bidders. The CCI found a prima facie case and ordered an investigation by its Director General, whose report was adverse to some parties. Before the CCI could conclude proceedings, the State and the private bidders approached the Gauhati High Court, which stalled the CCI's proceedings on the reasoning that lottery is "res extra commercium" (outside normal trade) and exclusively governed by the separate Lotteries (Regulation) Act, so the Competition Act could not apply.
The Supreme Court held that even though lotteries are a specially regulated, res extra commercium business under the Regulation Act, that does not exclude scrutiny of anti-competitive conduct (like bid-rigging in the tender process) under the Competition Act: the two statutes operate in different fields and there was no real conflict requiring reconciliation. It held that a lottery ticket, while an "actionable claim" and not "goods," still falls within the expansive, inclusive definition of "service" under Section 2(u) of the Competition Act, since a lottery purchaser is a "potential user" of that service. The Court found the High Court's intervention "extremely premature," since it should have let the CCI's investigation run its course, with any aggrieved party free to use the statutory appeal under Section 53B of the Competition Act instead of approaching the High Court midway. The High Court's judgment was set aside; the State's writ petition was directed to be treated as closed (since the CCI had already clarified it was not proceeding against the State), while the private bidders' writ petitions were dismissed, allowing the CCI investigation to continue.
A business being specially regulated by its own statute (like lotteries) does not automatically place it beyond the reach of general competition law: anti-competitive practices such as bid-rigging can still be investigated by the CCI, and courts should let a regulatory investigation run to completion rather than intervening prematurely when a statutory appeal remedy already exists.
