Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Civil ProcedureSupreme Court of India

D. Laxmamma vs. S. Halappa and Ors.

Civil AppealDecided 1 Nov 2022
Civil Appeal No. 7512 of 2012
Uday Umesh Lalit · Sanjiv Khanna

Background

The petitioner sought review of an earlier Supreme Court judgment in Civil Appeal No. 7512 of 2012 but filed the review petition 975 days late. She applied for condonation of this delay, offering an explanation for the delay.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court found the explanation offered for the 975-day delay unsatisfactory and declined to condone it. As a result, the review petition itself was dismissed solely on the ground of limitation, without the Court examining the merits of the review.

Lesson Learnt

Courts apply limitation periods strictly even to review petitions; an inadequate or unconvincing explanation for a long delay can result in a case being dismissed on that technical ground alone, without ever reaching its merits, so any review or appeal should be filed promptly and any delay explained credibly.

D. Laxmamma vs. S. Halappa and Ors. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware