Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Criminal LawSupreme Court of India

Dablu Kujur vs. The State of Jharkhand

Not available · 2024 INSC 197Decided 12 Mar 2024
Not available

Background

The appellant, accused in an FIR registered under Sections 302 (murder) and 120-B/34 (criminal conspiracy) of the IPC and Section 25(1-B)/26/27/35 of the Arms Act, challenged a Jharkhand High Court order that had dismissed his bail application. During the Supreme Court hearing, it emerged that the trial was almost complete, with nearly all prosecution witnesses already examined except one.

Decision Breakdown

Given that the trial was at its final stage, the Supreme Court declined to release the appellant on bail, reasoning that releasing him at this point served little purpose given how close the trial was to conclusion. Separately, the Court noted and reiterated a series of standing directions (from an earlier order in related proceedings) requiring police officers to strictly follow procedural safeguards under the Criminal Procedure Code when filing investigation reports, including properly documenting reasons under Section 169 Cr.P.C. when there is insufficient evidence, forwarding all relevant documents and witness statements to the Magistrate under Section 170, and following proper procedure for further investigation reports. The Court directed that these directions be circulated to all Chief Secretaries and High Court Registrar Generals for compliance, and disposed of the appeal accordingly.

Lesson Learnt

Courts are less inclined to grant bail once a trial is nearly complete, since the practical benefit of interim release diminishes; separately, police across India are under a standing Supreme Court mandate to follow strict, transparent documentation procedures when closing or forwarding investigation reports.

Dablu Kujur vs. The State of Jharkhand – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware