Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
This was a decades-long dispute between a step-mother (Darubai) and her four step-daughters (one of whom, Kamalabai, was the respondent) over land and houses left behind by the family patriarch, Dajiba, who died intestate (without a will). The daughters sued for partition, claiming a combined 4/5th share of the property; Darubai defended a partial sale of the property to a third party, claiming she had sold it as "karta" (family manager) out of legal necessity, to fund one daughter's marriage. The trial court ruled for the daughters, the first appellate court partly sided with Darubai on the sale, and the High Court in second appeal restored the trial court's original decree in the daughters' favour, prompting Darubai's appeal to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court held that when property devolves under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (i.e., a Hindu man dies without a will), his heirs inherit it as individual "tenants-in-common" with fixed, separate shares, not as members of a joint Hindu family holding it jointly under a "karta" (manager) system. Relying on its own settled precedent (CWT v. Chander Sen and later cases), the Court explained that such inherited property does not automatically become joint family "coparcenary" property, and no one heir can claim to manage or sell the whole as its karta. Since Darubai and her four step-daughters each held a fixed 1/5th share upon Dajiba's death, Darubai had no legal authority as "karta" to sell any part of the property beyond her own 1/5th share, even citing family necessity. The appeal was accordingly dismissed, upholding the daughters' partition decree, with no order as to costs.
When a Hindu man dies without a will, his heirs (including widow and daughters) each inherit a fixed, individual share of the property as co-owners, not as a joint family unit, so no single heir can act as a "karta" to sell or manage the whole property on behalf of the others without their consent.
