Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
In September 2010, a Sub-Inspector, acting on a tip-off, stopped Dayalu Kashyap while he was transporting ganja concealed at both ends of a wooden "Kanwad" (a shoulder pole carrying bundles) in a green polythene bag. Before conducting the search, the officer informed the appellant of his right under Section 50 of the NDPS Act to be searched before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, but the record showed the appellant was also given a third option, to be searched by the officer himself, which he verbally accepted. A Special Court convicted him under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act, sentencing him to 10 years' rigorous imprisonment plus a Rs. 1 lakh fine (with a further year in default of payment), and the Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed his appeal. By the time the Supreme Court took up the case, the appellant had already served the full 10-year term and part of the default sentence; the Court had already ordered his release, substituting the default sentence, and the only remaining legal question was whether the search itself was valid.
The appellant's counsel argued that offering him a "third option" (search by the officer himself), not one of the two choices (Gazetted Officer or Magistrate) actually listed in Section 50(1), deviated from the statute and, per precedent (State of Rajasthan v. Parmanand, relying on the Constitution Bench in State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh), should vitiate the recovery and conviction. The Supreme Court held that the Section 50 safeguard applies specifically to a "personal search" of a person, whereas here the contraband was recovered from a bag carried on the Kanwad, not from the appellant's own body/person. The Court declined to extend the Section 50 protection to cover recovery from an item merely being carried by the accused, rejecting the argument that any procedural defect in offering the search options would also taint this non-personal recovery. The appeal was accordingly dismissed, with the parties left to bear their own costs, though by this point the appellant had already been released from custody following the Court's earlier interim order.
The mandatory safeguard under Section 50 of the NDPS Act, the right to be searched before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, applies only to a search of a person's own body, not to items or containers merely being carried by that person; procedural lapses in offering those search choices will not automatically invalidate a conviction based on contraband recovered from a bag or container rather than from the person themselves.
