Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Criminal LawSupreme Court of India

Dechamma I.M. @ Dechamma Koushik vs. The State of Karnataka & Anr.

Not available · 2024 INSC 972Decided 4 Dec 2024
Not available
Justice B.R. Gavai · Justice K.V. Viswanathan · Justice K.V. Viswanathan

Background

A married woman filed an FIR alleging that her husband and several relatives, including the appellant (who was accused of having an extramarital relationship with the husband both before and after the marriage), harassed her mentally and physically over an unfulfilled dowry demand. The appellant sought quashing of the criminal proceedings against her under Section 482 Cr.P.C., arguing she was not a "relative" of the husband within the meaning of Section 498A IPC, but the Karnataka High Court dismissed her petition. She appealed to the Supreme Court. It was also noted that the complainant and her husband had since divorced by mutual consent.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed the proceedings against the appellant. Relying on its earlier decision in U. Suvetha v. State (2009), the Court reiterated that a "relative" under Section 498A IPC must be a person connected by blood, marriage, or adoption: a girlfriend or a woman having an extramarital relationship with the husband cannot be treated as his "relative," however morally objectionable her conduct might be. Since the FIR and chargesheet contained no material connecting the appellant's alleged conduct to a demand for dowry, continuing the prosecution against her would amount to an abuse of the process of law.

Lesson Learnt

Section 498A IPC (cruelty by husband or his relatives) applies only to persons who are relatives by blood, marriage, or adoption. It cannot be stretched to cover a husband's girlfriend or partner in an extramarital relationship, even if her conduct contributed to the wife's distress.

Dechamma I.M. @ Dechamma Koushik vs. The State of Karnataka & Anr. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware