Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Deepika Singh, a Nursing Officer at PGIMER Chandigarh, married a widower who had two children from his first marriage; at her request, those two children were entered as hers in official service records, and she later availed child-care leave for them. When she had her own first biological child in 2019 and applied for maternity leave, PGIMER rejected the request, treating the newborn as her "third surviving child" (since Rule 43 of the 1972 Rules allows maternity leave only to a woman with fewer than two surviving children) and instead granted only a mix of earned/medical/extraordinary leave. Both the Central Administrative Tribunal and the Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld this denial, reasoning that having availed benefits for her step-children, she could not claim maternity leave was for a "first" child.
The Supreme Court held that maternity leave under Rule 43 and child-care leave under Rule 43-C are distinct entitlements serving different purposes, and that availing child-care leave for step-children does not convert them into "surviving children" for purposes of denying maternity leave for one's own biological delivery. Applying a purposive, beneficial interpretation (drawing support from the Maternity Benefit Act 1961, Articles 14, 15, 21, 42 of the Constitution, and India's international commitments such as CEDAW), the Court reasoned that childbirth must be treated as a natural incident of employment, not a ground for disentitlement, and that the law must recognise that families take many non-traditional forms, including blended families formed after remarriage, which deserve equal protection rather than being penalised by a rigid, traditional notion of "family." The Court set aside both the Tribunal's and the High Court's orders, held the appellant was entitled to maternity leave, allowed the appeal, and directed that admissible benefits be released to her within two months.
Courts will read welfare provisions like maternity leave purposively and in light of constitutional equality guarantees; taking on a parenting role for a spouse's children from an earlier marriage (and availing child-care leave for them) does not disqualify a woman from maternity leave for her own biological child: rigid, traditional definitions of "family" cannot be used to deny statutory benefits.
