Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1073
In circumstantial-evidence cases, forensic and DNA evidence must actually corroborate the alleged crime: a conviction cannot survive where the most crucial scientific evidence, on its own terms, points away from rather than toward the prosecution's theory.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1074
A conviction based purely on circumstantial evidence requires every link in the chain, timeline, witness credibility, forensic matches, and motive, to be proven beyond reasonable doubt; gaps or suppressed evidence at any link entitle the accused to the benefit of the doubt, even in a serious case like a double murder.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8505
Courts will not quash a criminal case merely because the accused has a plausible alibi-type defence; unless that defence is conclusive and undisputed, the matter must be tested through the ordinary trial process.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8547
A private compromise between victim and accused cannot by itself secure quashing of a case involving serious, heinous allegations like attempted murder with a weapon: such matters must proceed to trial regardless of settlement.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8563
Railway Claims Tribunals cannot reject a bona fide passenger's death claim based on speculative inferences when there is no direct evidence of an alternative cause of death; the compensation scheme under the Railways Act is to be interpreted generously in favour of victims' families.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8559
In matrimonial offences, courts can and do quash criminal proceedings once a genuine compromise is verified directly with the complainant, sparing both parties a prolonged and pointless trial.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8541
A co-accused's bail does not automatically extend to another accused where their actual roles in the offence differ materially; delay caused by one's own defence counsel cannot later be used as a ground for bail.
Execution Petition · 2026:DHC:8567
An arbitral award must be adequately stamped before a court can enforce it; courts give only a limited window to cure such defects, after which the award becomes legally unusable until the deficiency is fixed.
Arbitration Petition · 2026:DHC:8555
A genuine settlement reached through mediation renders a pending arbitration-related court petition moot, allowing parties to close out litigation quickly once they resolve their dispute privately.
9257 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
A Delhi Development Authority (DDA) leasehold plot, originally granted to a private lessee in 1970, was compulsorily purchased by the Income Tax Department in 1988 under special tax-acquisition powers and then resold at public auction, where Karamdeep Finance became the highest bidder and received a registered sale deed in 1997. Karamdeep applied to the DDA to convert its leasehold rights into freehold rights and paid conversion charges, but the DDA then separately demanded a large "unearned increase" payment (a share of the gain in market value) on the transfer; Karamdeep challenged this demand and also separately sought a refund of the conversion charges it had already paid, leading to cross-appeals after the Delhi High Court ruled partly in favour of each side.
On the DDA's appeal, the Supreme Court held that the "unearned increase" clause in the original lease was meant to compensate the lessor when a lessee's voluntary transfer let a premium-rate plot fetch full market value, but here the property had been acquired by the government under statutory power and resold by public auction at market price, with the Income Tax Department having already paid unearned increase to the DDA at the acquisition stage, so there was no further unearned increase due from the auction-purchaser; the DDA's appeal was dismissed. On Karamdeep's cross-appeal for a refund of conversion charges, the Court construed the sale deed as a whole, including a clause tying Karamdeep's rights to the terms of the original 1988 transfer agreement, which only covered leasehold rights, and the original auction notice itself, which described the property as a "leasehold residential plot." It held that despite some broadly worded ownership clauses, the deed did not convey a freehold/absolute title, so Karamdeep remained liable to pay conversion charges and was not entitled to a refund, while directing the DDA to process Karamdeep's pending freehold-conversion application.
When interpreting a property sale deed, courts read the whole document together with the surrounding transaction documents (like the auction notice) rather than relying on one favourable clause in isolation: a document that calls a sale "absolute" in one place does not automatically override more specific clauses elsewhere that limit what was actually transferred.
