Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1073
In circumstantial-evidence cases, forensic and DNA evidence must actually corroborate the alleged crime: a conviction cannot survive where the most crucial scientific evidence, on its own terms, points away from rather than toward the prosecution's theory.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1074
A conviction based purely on circumstantial evidence requires every link in the chain, timeline, witness credibility, forensic matches, and motive, to be proven beyond reasonable doubt; gaps or suppressed evidence at any link entitle the accused to the benefit of the doubt, even in a serious case like a double murder.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8505
Courts will not quash a criminal case merely because the accused has a plausible alibi-type defence; unless that defence is conclusive and undisputed, the matter must be tested through the ordinary trial process.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8547
A private compromise between victim and accused cannot by itself secure quashing of a case involving serious, heinous allegations like attempted murder with a weapon: such matters must proceed to trial regardless of settlement.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8563
Railway Claims Tribunals cannot reject a bona fide passenger's death claim based on speculative inferences when there is no direct evidence of an alternative cause of death; the compensation scheme under the Railways Act is to be interpreted generously in favour of victims' families.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8559
In matrimonial offences, courts can and do quash criminal proceedings once a genuine compromise is verified directly with the complainant, sparing both parties a prolonged and pointless trial.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8541
A co-accused's bail does not automatically extend to another accused where their actual roles in the offence differ materially; delay caused by one's own defence counsel cannot later be used as a ground for bail.
Execution Petition · 2026:DHC:8567
An arbitral award must be adequately stamped before a court can enforce it; courts give only a limited window to cure such defects, after which the award becomes legally unusable until the deficiency is fixed.
Arbitration Petition · 2026:DHC:8555
A genuine settlement reached through mediation renders a pending arbitration-related court petition moot, allowing parties to close out litigation quickly once they resolve their dispute privately.
9257 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Rajender Prashad, a bus conductor with DTC, was accused in 1994 of collecting fares from three passengers without issuing them tickets. Although the departmental enquiry officer found the charges not established, DTC's disciplinary authority disagreed and removed him from service in 1996. On appeal, DTC's own Chairman-cum-Managing Director set aside the removal but imposed a reduced punishment, reverting him to the initial pay scale for two years without back wages for the intervening period. Rajender Prashad challenged this before the Industrial Tribunal, which ruled the punishment illegal and awarded him full wages, including for the period he was out of service.
The High Court held that its power to interfere with an Industrial Tribunal's award is limited to cases of patent illegality or perversity, and found none here. Critically, DTC's disciplinary authority had disagreed with the enquiry officer's finding of innocence without first issuing a proper "disagreement note" giving Rajender Prashad a chance to respond before deciding to remove him: a legal requirement when overturning a favourable enquiry finding. Since DTC also never produced the enquiry report before the Tribunal to justify its position, the Tribunal's conclusion that the punishment was baseless was upheld, as was the award of full wages for the disputed period. The Court dismissed DTC's petition and, noting that DTC had been fighting over roughly 17 months' back wages for 32 years, imposed Rs. 1,00,000 in costs on DTC (split between a legal aid fund, the PM Relief Fund, and the employee), with liberty to recover it from the responsible officer.
An employer that wants to overrule a departmental enquiry officer's finding of "not guilty" must first share its tentative reasons with the employee and give them a chance to respond before finalising a harsher punishment, skipping this step can render the punishment legally invalid, and courts may penalise government departments for pursuing minor disputes through decades of litigation at public expense.
