Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Criminal LawDelhi High Court

Devender Kumar vs. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:7455Decided 2 Sept 2026New Delhi Bench
W.P.(CRL) 2567/2026CNR: DLHC010396402026
Justice Manoj Jain

Background

The petitioner said he had received threatening calls purportedly from a notorious gangster, Kapil Sangwan @ Nandu, and had been given a police protection officer as a result. That protection was withdrawn in July 2026, and although he approached the district's Witness Protection Committee for restoration, he received no update on the outcome, even as a shooting incident occurred just 200 metres from his home.

Decision Breakdown

The Court directed that the petition itself be treated as a formal representation to the Witness Protection Committee, which was told to obtain a fresh threat-assessment report and pass appropriate orders, with the petitioner allowed to participate in that process. In the meantime, as an interim measure to address his genuine apprehension, the Court ordered the earlier police protection to be restored until the Committee took its own final decision, making clear this interim order should not influence the Committee's independent assessment.

Lesson Learnt

When an administrative body like a Witness Protection Committee is slow to decide on a genuine safety concern, courts can step in to order interim protective measures while the proper decision-making process, with its own expert threat assessment, is allowed to run its course.

Devender Kumar vs. State NCT of Delhi and Ors. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware