Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Criminal LawSupreme Court of India

Devesh Chourasia vs The District Magistrate, Jabalpur & Ors.

Criminal AppealDecided 24 Jan 2022
Criminal Appeal No. 125 of 2022
Dr Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud · Dinesh Maheshwari

Background

The appellant was detained under Section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980 by an order dated 11 May 2021 in connection with an FIR alleging supply/distribution of fake Remdesivir injections to COVID-19 patients at a hospital in Jabalpur; his detention was later extended by three months. His writ petition challenging the detention was heard together with, and rejected along with, a companion petition filed by the hospital's owner, Sarabjit Singh Mokha, both by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on 24 August 2021. In the companion case, the Supreme Court had already set aside the detention order and its extensions on 29 October 2021, since the facts and grounds of detention in both cases were found to be substantially similar.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court noted that the grounds of detention against the appellant were virtually identical to those against Sarabjit Singh Mokha, whose detention order was already quashed for (i) delay in the government considering the detenu's representation, depriving him of his right under Section 8(1) of the NSA to expeditious consideration, and (ii) failure of the Central and State Governments to communicate rejection of the representation in a time-bound manner. Neither the State (through the AAG) nor the Union (through the ASG) disputed that the earlier judgment applied equally here, and no distinguishing feature was shown. Following its own precedent in the Mokha case, the Court granted leave, allowed the appeal, and set aside both the original detention order and its extensions.

Lesson Learnt

Preventive detention orders are strictly bound by procedural safeguards: unexplained delay in deciding a detenu's representation, or failing to promptly communicate the decision on it, is by itself enough to invalidate a detention order, regardless of the seriousness of the underlying allegations.

Devesh Chourasia vs The District Magistrate, Jabalpur & Ors. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware