Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1073
In circumstantial-evidence cases, forensic and DNA evidence must actually corroborate the alleged crime: a conviction cannot survive where the most crucial scientific evidence, on its own terms, points away from rather than toward the prosecution's theory.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1074
A conviction based purely on circumstantial evidence requires every link in the chain, timeline, witness credibility, forensic matches, and motive, to be proven beyond reasonable doubt; gaps or suppressed evidence at any link entitle the accused to the benefit of the doubt, even in a serious case like a double murder.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8505
Courts will not quash a criminal case merely because the accused has a plausible alibi-type defence; unless that defence is conclusive and undisputed, the matter must be tested through the ordinary trial process.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8547
A private compromise between victim and accused cannot by itself secure quashing of a case involving serious, heinous allegations like attempted murder with a weapon: such matters must proceed to trial regardless of settlement.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8563
Railway Claims Tribunals cannot reject a bona fide passenger's death claim based on speculative inferences when there is no direct evidence of an alternative cause of death; the compensation scheme under the Railways Act is to be interpreted generously in favour of victims' families.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8559
In matrimonial offences, courts can and do quash criminal proceedings once a genuine compromise is verified directly with the complainant, sparing both parties a prolonged and pointless trial.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8541
A co-accused's bail does not automatically extend to another accused where their actual roles in the offence differ materially; delay caused by one's own defence counsel cannot later be used as a ground for bail.
Execution Petition · 2026:DHC:8567
An arbitral award must be adequately stamped before a court can enforce it; courts give only a limited window to cure such defects, after which the award becomes legally unusable until the deficiency is fixed.
Arbitration Petition · 2026:DHC:8555
A genuine settlement reached through mediation renders a pending arbitration-related court petition moot, allowing parties to close out litigation quickly once they resolve their dispute privately.
9257 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Several mining leaseholders in Village Billi Markundi, Sonbhadra District (Uttar Pradesh), had their mining activity halted after the National Green Tribunal (NGT), acting on a plea about illegal mining near the Kaimur Wildlife Sanctuary, directed the State to stop all mining on land notified as reserved forest under Section 4 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, pending a further notification under Section 20 of that Act. The leaseholders were never made parties before the NGT even though the order directly stopped their operations. They appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing their specific lands had already been excluded from the forest notification in earlier, decades-long litigation that had reached finality in their favour.
The Supreme Court noted that the State of UP eventually issued the required Section 20 notification on 15.6.2020, finally confirming which leases (including the appellants') fell outside the reserved forest area and could validly operate. The real dispute left was whether the leases should be extended for the period mining was obstructed, or whether leaseholders should simply be compensated. The Court held that under the applicable Mining Rules and the State's 2017 New Mining Policy, there was no statutory basis to extend leases retroactively for the obstructed period, and the right to extension must flow from statute or lease terms, neither of which existed here. Instead, exercising its special "complete justice" power under Article 142 of the Constitution, the Court directed that security deposits and advance royalties paid by the leaseholders be refunded with 9% simple interest from the date mining was obstructed, since the leaseholders had suffered through no fault of their own.
Even when a government delay or an order passed without hearing you causes real financial loss, courts generally cannot bypass clear statutory rules to grant relief (like retroactively extending a licence) that the law does not provide for, but they can use equitable powers to ensure monetary compensation with interest for the harm caused.
