Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Arbitration & Commercial LawDelhi High Court

Dilip Buildcon Limited vs. National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) & Anr.

Original Miscellaneous Petition (Interim, Commercial) · 2026:DHC:7933Decided 16 Sept 2026New Delhi Bench
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 293/2024CNR: DLHC010565152024
Justice Om Prakash Shukla

Background

Dilip Buildcon had approached the Court for interim relief in a dispute with NHAI over a highway construction contract, pending formal arbitration. Both sides confirmed at this hearing that they had each already nominated their arbitrator, but a presiding arbitrator was yet to be appointed.

Decision Breakdown

The Court directed that the presiding arbitrator be appointed by mutual consent of the two nominated arbitrators within three weeks. It ordered that once the tribunal is formed, this interim-relief petition will be treated as an application before the arbitral tribunal itself (rather than the Court), and that the interim protections already granted by the Court would continue until the tribunal makes its own decision on the matter.

Lesson Learnt

Once an arbitral tribunal is being constituted, courts typically hand over ongoing interim-relief matters to that tribunal rather than continuing to decide them, while ensuring existing protections remain in place during the transition.

Dilip Buildcon Limited vs. National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) & Anr. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware