Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
A partnership firm, M/s Global Packaging, took loans from Bank of Baroda and, in part repayment, issued three cheques worth Rs. 25 lakh each that were dishonoured for insufficient funds. The Bank filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 (cheque dishonour) read with Section 141 (offences by companies/firms) of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the firm's authorised signatory and against the appellant, Dilip Hariramani, as a partner, but crucially, never made the firm itself an accused. The trial court and, on appeal, the Sessions Court and Chhattisgarh High Court all convicted the appellant and sentenced him to imprisonment along with a heavy compensation order (enhanced up to Rs. 1.2 crore), relying on the view that a partner's personal liability under Section 141 did not depend on the firm being separately arraigned.
The Supreme Court traced its own precedents on Section 141, holding that vicarious liability under that provision is a "deeming fiction" that necessarily presupposes the company or firm has itself committed the offence as the principal accused: a partner or officer can only be dragged into liability derivatively from the firm's guilt. Since the Bank never made the firm a party to the complaint at all (not merely a defect in the case title, but a complete failure to prosecute the firm), there was no principal offence established against which the appellant's liability could attach. The Court held its earlier three-judge decision in Aneeta Hada (and the older C.V. Parekh ruling) laid down the correct binding law on this point, and it accordingly set aside the appellant's conviction and sentence entirely, acquitting him.
A partner or director cannot be convicted for a dishonoured cheque issued by a firm or company under Section 138/141 of the NI Act unless the firm or company itself is made an accused in the complaint: merely naming individuals as "partners" in the body of the complaint is not enough if the entity that actually incurred the debt and issued the cheque is never prosecuted.
