Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Service & Administrative LawSupreme Court of India

Dr. A. Selvaraj vs. C.B.M. College & Ors.

Civil AppealDecided 4 Mar 2022
Civil Appeal No. 1698 of 2022
M.R. Shah · B.V. Nagarathna

Background

The appellant, a retired Associate Professor of Chemistry at an aided college in Coimbatore, faced a long delay in receiving his retirement dues after retiring in 2011. Although his terminal benefits were eventually paid during the pendency of his writ petition, the question of interest on the delayed payment, and who should bear responsibility for the delay, remained unresolved through a single judge's order, a Division Bench appeal, and a government enquiry that blamed the college's former Secretary, who was too unwell to respond to the enquiry.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held that since the delay was in no way the retired employee's fault, he was entitled to interest on the delayed payment regardless of the unresolved dispute between the college management, the former Secretary, and the government over who was actually responsible for causing the delay. It directed the College/Management/Trustees to pay the interest within six weeks, while leaving them free to later recover that amount from whoever the government's final enquiry decision holds responsible. The Court emphasised that an employee should not be made to suffer for an administrative blame-game that isn't of his making.

Lesson Learnt

When institutions or officials cannot agree among themselves about who caused a delay in paying a retiree's dues, the retired employee should not be left waiting: the institution must pay the interest first and sort out internal responsibility afterward.

Dr. A. Selvaraj vs. C.B.M. College & Ors. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware