Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Service & Administrative LawDelhi High Court

Dr Rashi Bankar vs. Jawaharlal Nehru University & Anr.

Letters Patent Appeal · 2026:DHC:7967-DBDecided 16 Sept 2026New Delhi Bench
LPA 739/2026CNR: DLHC010439932026
Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya · Justice Tejas Karia

Background

The appellant, a JNU employee on deputation to FSSAI as Assistant Director (Technical) since 2022 (already extended once for a further year), sought a second extension of her deputation. JNU declined, citing its own acute staff shortage and the appellant's earlier commitment to the Vice Chancellor that she would not seek any further extension. A Single Judge dismissed her challenge to this refusal, and she appealed.

Decision Breakdown

The Division Bench held that deputation requires the willingness of both the borrowing and lending departments, plus the employee, and no employee has an absolute right to continued deputation. Since JNU's refusal was based on its genuine staffing needs and the appellant's own prior commitment not to seek further extension, the Bench found nothing arbitrary in the refusal and upheld the Single Judge's dismissal, finding no ground to interfere.

Lesson Learnt

An employee on deputation has no automatic right to keep extending it indefinitely; the parent department's operational needs, and any commitments the employee has made about not seeking further extensions, will be given weight by the courts.

Dr Rashi Bankar vs. Jawaharlal Nehru University & Anr. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware