Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Family LawSupreme Court of India

Dr. Seema Sikka vs Dr. Pranav Sikka

Transfer Petition (Civil)Decided 5 Sept 2022
Transfer Petition (Civil) No.1217 of 2021
Uday Umesh Lalit · S. Ravindra Bhat

Background

The wife filed transfer petitions asking that a Guardian Petition (pending before the Family Court, Noida) and a Restitution of Conjugal Rights petition (pending before the Family Court, Meerut), both filed by the husband, be moved to the Family Courts at Karkardooma, Delhi. The Court had earlier issued notice on both petitions and, during the hearing, was informed that the husband had already withdrawn the Meerut proceedings.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held that no case had been made out to transfer the remaining proceedings (the Guardian Petition) from Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh to Delhi. Instead of ordering a transfer, the Court directed the Family Court at Gautam Budh Nagar to consider referring the matter to mediation so the parties could explore a negotiated settlement, and directed the parties to appear before that court on 12.09.2022. The transfer petitions were disposed of on these terms.

Lesson Learnt

A spouse seeking transfer of matrimonial proceedings under Article 139A/Section 25 CPC must show genuine hardship or inconvenience; courts often prefer to nudge parties toward mediation rather than shift the case's venue, especially once one of the connected proceedings has already been withdrawn.

Dr. Seema Sikka vs Dr. Pranav Sikka – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware