Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
EIH Limited (owner of the Hotel Oberoi Grand, Kolkata) let out a showroom in the hotel's arcade to the respondent tenant in 1993 at a rent of Rs. 10,000 per month, with the tenant separately liable to pay municipal taxes. When the landlord later sought to evict the tenant by a notice under the Transfer of Property Act (rather than under the special tenancy law), the tenant argued the ordinary civil suit was not maintainable because the premises fell under the protective West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, which applies unless the "monthly rent" exceeds Rs. 10,000. The landlord argued that adding the tenant's separate obligation to pay municipal tax should push the total above the Rs. 10,000 ceiling, taking the tenancy outside the Act's protection. Both the Single Judge and a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court rejected the landlord's plaint, holding the Act applied.
The Supreme Court held that municipal tax which a tenant is statutorily or contractually obliged to pay separately does not automatically become "part of the rent" merely because, for the limited purpose of recovery, the law (Sections 230-231 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act and Section 5(8) of the 1997 Tenancy Act) allows unpaid tax to be recovered "as if it were rent." Clarifying its own earlier ruling in Calcutta Gujarati Education Society, the Court explained that treating tax "as rent" is a legal fiction created only to give the landlord a recovery mechanism, not a merger of tax into the rent figure itself: tax becomes part of rent only if the tenancy agreement itself says so (as in Popat and Kotecha Property, distinguished on facts). Since the agreement here fixed rent at Rs. 10,000/month with tax payable separately, the rent for the statutory ceiling remained Rs. 10,000, the 1997 Act applied, and the ordinary civil suit for eviction was correctly held not maintainable. The appeals were dismissed with no order as to costs.
Whether a tenant's obligation to bear municipal taxes counts toward "rent" for rent-control ceiling purposes depends on what the tenancy agreement itself says: a statutory provision allowing unpaid tax to be recovered "as rent" is only a recovery mechanism, not proof that tax is legally part of the rent.
