Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
In liquidation proceedings against a corporate debtor (Amrit Feeds Limited), the Liquidator put certain factory assets up for e-auction. The appellant, Eva Agro Feeds Private Limited, was the highest (and sole) bidder at the reserve price of Rs. 10 crore and was issued an E-auction certificate declaring it the winner. The very next day, however, the Liquidator cancelled the auction, citing a clause reserving his "absolute right" to cancel without giving reasons, and stated he wanted a fresh auction hoping for a higher price (partly because a similarly-valued lot had recently fetched a much higher bid, and partly because of an anonymous tip that the appellant's director had once been a promoter of the corporate debtor). The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) ordered the Liquidator to let the appellant complete the purchase, but the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), on Punjab National Bank's appeal, reversed this and allowed a fresh auction, leading to the present appeal to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court held that under the IBC Liquidation Process Regulations, once the highest bid is accepted and the earnest money is paid, an auction reaches a stage where the Liquidator cannot simply cancel it based on a mere hope or expectation that a higher price might be obtained in a fresh round, especially since the very next re-auction notice fixed the same reserve price of Rs. 10 crore that the appellant had already bid. The Court held that a Liquidator's discretion to cancel is not absolute or unfettered even where a contract clause purports to grant it, and that post-auction cancellation based on unverified third-party allegations is impermissible unless fraud or collusion is actually shown to have vitiated the auction. On the "related party" objection, the Court found that the appellant's director had ceased to have any role in the corporate debtor over a decade before the auction, so he could not be treated as an ineligible "related party" under Section 29A of the Code at the relevant time. The Supreme Court therefore set aside the NCLAT's order and restored the NCLT's order directing completion of the sale in the appellant's favour.
In an insolvency liquidation sale, once a valid e-auction concludes with an accepted highest bid, the liquidator cannot cancel it merely in hopes of a better price later: such discretion is not unlimited, and cancellation after the fact requires real evidence of fraud or collusion, not speculation or unverified rumors about the bidder.
