Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Uncategorized (needs manual review)Supreme Court of India

Ex. Havildar Bhoop Singh vs Union of India & Ors.

Diary No.Decided 30 Aug 2022
Diary No. 19482 of 2020
Uday Umesh Lalit · Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud · Sanjay Kishan Kaul · S. Abdul Nazeer

Background

This matter had already gone through a civil appeal and a subsequent review petition, both of which were unsuccessful for the petitioner, a former Army Havildar. As a last resort, he filed a curative petition: the narrowest and final remedy available in Indian law, used only in truly exceptional cases after both an appeal and a review have failed, and confined strictly to situations of a genuine breach of natural justice or a judge's bias/lack of jurisdiction as recognized in Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra (2002).

Decision Breakdown

The four-judge bench examined the curative petition and the supporting documents and held that no case was made out within the narrow grounds recognized for curative petitions under Rupa Ashok Hurra. Since a curative petition is not meant to be a fresh appeal on the merits but only a safety valve for exceptional procedural defects, and none were shown here, the Court dismissed the petition in a brief order without further elaboration on the underlying dispute.

Lesson Learnt

A curative petition is an extraordinary, last-resort remedy. It is not another chance to re-argue the merits of a case already decided and reviewed, and will be entertained only where a genuine violation of natural justice or judicial bias/lack of jurisdiction is shown.

Ex. Havildar Bhoop Singh vs Union of India & Ors. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware